Liverpool abandon Virgil van Dijk interest, apologise to Southampton

Liverpool have abandoned their hopes of signing Virgil van Dijk and apologised to Southampton for "any misunderstanding" over their interest.
Press Association Sport reports that Saints had not received any contact from the Reds regarding their defender, yet the Dutch defender apparently indicated an eagerness to become the latest player to swap St Mary's for Anfield.
Jurgen Klopp is reported to have made Van Dijk his top target, with the chance to work with the Liverpool boss to have played a significant role in the player's decision -- information that did not sit well with Southampton.
Saints are reported to have asked the Premier League on Tuesday to investigate an alleged illegal approach, which has been followed by Liverpool announcing the end of their pursuit.
"Liverpool Football Club would like to put on record our regret over recent media speculation regarding Southampton Football Club and player transfers between the two clubs," the statement on Liverpool's official website read.
"We apologise to the owner, board of directors and fans of Southampton for any misunderstanding regarding Virgil van Dijk.
"We respect Southampton's position and can confirm we have ended any interest in the player."
Virgil van Dijk has five years remaining on his deal at St Mary's.
Southampton did not wish to comment on a statement that followed high-level talks on Wednesday.
Press Association Sport reports that those discussions were the first time the clubs had spoken this summer, having not spoken about Van Dijk before then.
According to sources, the apology is likely to be the end of the matter in terms of a Premier League investigation into the approach for a player who still has five years remaining on his deal at St Mary's.
The Reds had been expecting to pay in excess of £50 milllion -- a world-record fee for a defender -- and were reported to be willing to make him the highest-paid player at the club.
Van Dijk is said to have preferred Liverpool ahead of interest from fellow interested parties Chelsea and Manchester City.
Last month Southampton chairman Ralph Krueger told Press Association Sport that the club would no longer be bullied in the transfer market, saying they were in a position to turn down a £60m bid for Van Dijk.
"We do not need to sell any player for the first time since I've been here," Krueger said.
"I can make that statement and -- unless football decides it's in the best interests -- we don't need to do that."
Adam Lallana, Dejan Lovren and Rickie Lambert all left Southampton for Anfield in 2014, with Nathaniel Clyne following suit the following year and Sadio Mane in 2016.
Luke Shaw, Calum Chambers, Victor Wanyama and Morgan Schneiderlin have been other high-profile departures in recent years, while managers Mauricio Pochettino and Ronald Koeman have also left for pastures new.
Van Dijk is among the current Southampton stars attracting interest, having become one of the most sought-after defenders in the league since moving to the south coast from Celtic less than two years ago.
A fans' and players' player of the year in his first season at St Mary's, ankle ligament damage restricted him to 21 Premier League appearances in 2016-17.
Premier League rules state a club can only approach a player if they have the written consent of the selling club or alternatively if the player is out of contract or about to become out of contract.
The regulations state: "Any club which by itself, by any of its officials, by any of its players, by its intermediary, by any other person on its behalf or by any other means whatsoever makes an approach either directly or indirectly to a contract player except as permitted by either rule T.1.2 or rule T.2 shall be in breach of these rules and may be dealt with under the provisions of section W of these rules [disciplinary]."
Liverpool are already serving a two-year suspension from signing youth players registered with Premier League or EFL clubs in the preceding 18 months.
They have admitted to making an illegal approach last year to a 12-year-old attached to Stoke's academy. The second year of the ban is suspended for three years.

Chelsea to offer Juventus £48m plus Nemanja Matic to nab Leonardo Bonucci? Transfer news from Thursday's papers



Chelsea are ready to swap Nemanja Matic plus £48m for Juventus centre back Leonardo Bonucci

Antonio Conte wants to be reunited with his former defender Bonucci having won three Serie A titles with him at Juve, according to the Sun.
Juve value Bonucci at £60m but would consider the lower bid if a player was included - with Matic set to leave Stamford Bridge this summer, with Manchester United also keen.
Massimilano Allegri is looking to cash in on the centre back after he accused him of not following instructions during the Champions League final defeat to Real Madrid.
Leonardo Bonucci could be reunited with Antonio Conte at Chelsea 
Bonnuci has previously played for Inter MIlan and Bari but has never played outside of Italy.
The 30-year-old has 70 caps for his county, seven Serie A titles and three Italian Cups.

Chelsea's Diego Costa: 'Conte said he did not count on me for next season'

Chelsea striker Diego Costa claims Antonio Conte has told him he is not part of his plans at Chelsea.
The 26-year-old, who scored 26 goals in 46 games for the Premier League champions last season, says Conte sent him a text message informing him of his fate and Costa is now contemplating his future away from Stamford Bridge.
Speaking to reporters after Spain's 2-2 draw with Colombia on Wednesday night, Costa said: "I'm a Chelsea player, but they do not want me there. Antonio Conte has told me by message that I do not follow at Chelsea and that's it. Conte said he did not count on me for next season.
"It's a shame, I've already forwarded the message to Chelsea people to decide. But it is clear that the coach does not count on me and does not want me there. You have to find a team.''
An exit from Chelsea has long been on the cards for Costa, who has been the reported subject of a money-spinning offer from a Chinese Super League.
The striker has his heart set on a return to Atletico Madrid, though that move would be delayed due to the Spanish club's transfer embargo.
Antonio Conte and Diego Costa
Diego Costa says Antonio Costa informed him he no longer wants him at Chelsea.
"It would be nice to return to Atletico, but it is difficult to be four-five months without playing,'' Costa added in quotes reported by Marca. "Being five months without playing? I do not know, it's complicated, but people know that I love Atletico a lot and that I love living in Madrid.
"It would be nice to go back, but it's difficult to be four-five months without playing. It's a World Cup year and there's a lot to think about. I need to play, that's all.''
Costa did not feature for his Spain in the friendly in Murcia, where reported Manchester United target Alvaro Morata scored a late equaliser.
He joined the Blues in 2014 for a £32 million fee and has bagged 58 goals in 120 games, winning two Premier League titles and one League Cup.

Romelu Lukaku will earn more than Diego Costa as Chelsea move to clinch transfer

Chelsea plan to offer Romelu Lukaku higher wages than Diego Costa currently earns in order to bring him back to Stamford Bridge.

Play
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time0:00
Progress: 0%
0:00
Fullscreen
00:00
Mute
Lukaku confirmed yesterday that staying at Everton “is not an option” this summer and is in talks with the Merseyside club over securing a transfer away.
As Standard Sport first revealed in April 2016, the Belgium striker has made a return to Chelsea, where he started just one League game between 2011-14, his main priority. 
Chelsea are confident they can agree a fee but are not prepared to pay Everton’s asking price of £100million. They hope to spend £80m at most to secure his signature, which is already a huge increase on the £28m Everton paid Chelsea three years ago. 


Lukaku appeared to suggest on Tuesday that he has already secured a deal with his next club. But it is understood the forward actually meant he and agent Mino Raiola had agreed where his next club will be and no contract has yet been signed.
Chelsea are looking to pay him in excess of £150,000 a week, which is what Costa earns at the Blues. Lukaku, who has scored 85 goals in the Premier League having had loan spells at West Brom and Everton before moving to Goodison Park permanently, is on £80,000 a week. 
He rejected Everton’s offer of £140,000 a week in March because of his desire to rejoin Chelsea, where he feels he can win silverware. 
Manchester United are ready to give him £200,000 a week to move to Old Trafford, which is more than Chelsea are willing to offer, but they are aware of his desire to join the champions and are now pursuing Real Madrid’s Alvaro Morata.
The long-term future of Costa at Chelsea is still not certain, although he will not be signed by Atletico Madrid as their transfer ban from Fifa has been upheld.
0:00
/
6:16
How Antonio Conte turned Chelsea into title winners
He has just two years left on his contract, although there have been reports in Italy that he will be handed an extension and a pay rise.
romelulukaku0706.jpg
Photo: Dean Mouhtaropoulos/Getty Images
Coach Antonio Conte wanted Lukaku or Morata to be paired with Costa last season but the club failed to agree a deal with Everton and Real Madrid respectively.
The Italian wants more strength in depth to compete on four fronts, including the Champions League, next term anyway, but is considering going back to his original plan of playing with two strikers in a 4-2-4 formation.

Diego Costa Says Antonio Conte Told Striker He Isn't in Chelsea's Plans

LONDON, ENGLAND - MAY 27: Hector Bellerin of Arsenal challenges Diego Costa of Chelsea during The Emirates FA Cup Final between Arsenal and Chelsea at Wembley Stadium on May 27, 2017 in London, England.  (Photo by Laurence Griffiths/Getty Images)

Chelsea star Diego Costa has told Spanish reporters manager Antonio Conte has informed him he won't be part of his plans moving forward. 
Robbie Dunne of AS English shared some of the Spain international's comments, which he made after the 2-2 draw against Colombia on Wednesday:
It's a remarkable new development in a transfer saga that started last summer. As reported by BBC Sport, he said earlier this year he wanted to leave the Blues, but fortunately for the club, he didn't.
After a disappointing 2015-16 season, the former Atletico Madrid man bounced back in a big way. The 28-year-old scored 20 goals in the Premier League, playing a big role in the title run and keeping summer signing Michy Batshuayi on the bench in the process.
The timing of these latest comments is interesting, as plenty of rumours linking Everton's Romelu Lukaku with a return to Stamford Bridge have emerged recently. Bleacher Report's Dean Jones wondered about Costa's future when those rumours came to light:
As noted by Jones, former club Atletico isn't an option due to their transfer ban. Per Sky Sports, he's been linked with a move to China, but the ace striker might be too young to consider leaving Europe for a club in the Far East.

Rachel Weisz beguiles in Roger Michell's romantic thriller 'My Cousin Rachel'

Rachel Weisz in the movie "My Cousin Rachel." (Nicola Dive / 20th Century Fox Film Corp.)

Its title couldn't be more innocuous and genteel, but don't be taken in. Anchored in an exceptionally persuasive performance by Rachel Weisz, "My Cousin Rachel" is not only a triumphant exercise in dark and delicious romantic ambiguity, the pitfalls of being taken in are what this melodramatic thriller is all about.
First filmed more than 60 years ago with Olivia de Havilland in the title role and based on a novel set a century earlier, "My Cousin Rachel" has not only refused to date, it has if anything extended its relevance.
In fact, as written and directed with intelligence, zest and craft by Roger Michell and making expert use of Weisz's impeccable work, "My Cousin Rachel" comes off as remarkably modern, dealing with personal issues and power dynamics between men and women that arguably echo at least as strongly now as they did back in the day.
This is in significant measure due to the narrative skill of novelist Daphne du Maurier, in her prime one of the highest paid authors in the world. Du Maurier was capable of combining psychological acuity and deft plotting to such an extent that three of her novels ("Jamaica Inn," "The Birds" and the classic "Rebecca") were memorably filmed by Alfred Hitchcock.
With smart stories like "Venus" and "Notting Hill" and one of the best Jane Austen adaptations (1995's "Persuasion") to his credit, director Michell has always been expert at transitioning literate material to the screen.
He's helped here by a top visual team, including cinematographer Mike Eley, production designer Alice Normington, costume designer Dinah Collin and editor Kristina Hetherington. Working in tandem, they see to it that each image on the screen, whether it be wind-swept landscapes, gutted candles or Rachel's midnight-blue riding outfit against a milk-white steed, is visually thrilling without seeming fussy or overthought.
Though her name is on everyone's lips from the start, the title character doesn't appear for a while, which leaves the focus on the film's narrator, who hauntingly demands in an opening voice-over, "Rachel. Did she? Didn't she? Who's to blame?"
That questioner is Philip Ashley (Sam Claflin), who is tasked with filling in the film's complex back story in a brisk pre-credits prologue that contains more plot than many entire films.
Orphaned as a child, Philip is adopted by his cousin Ambrose, who the boy comes to love as a father. Returning from school determined to avoid "books, cities, clever talk," Philip has his tranquil Cornwall world upended several times over.
First his beloved Ambrose travels to Italy for his health, then Ambrose falls in love with and marries the half-Italian Rachel, "radiant, good, the kindest companion," then he begins sending home darker, more sinister letters hinting that Rachel is scheming to end his life.
Philip goes to Italy at once, but Ambrose has died by the time he arrives, Rachel has disappeared, and her mysterious Italian friend Rainaldi (Pierfrancesco Favino) insists the cause of Ambrose's death was a brain tumor that caused paroxysms of paranoia in the sick man.
Philip swears to wreak vengeance on the absent Rachel and returns to the rural estate he will soon inherit, looked after by his wary guardian/godfather Nick Kendall (Iain Glen) and Nick's good-humored daughter Louise (Holliday Grainger), who is clearly in love with the oblivious young man. All is tranquility itself, until Rachel pays an unexpected visit and the film begins in earnest.
The 1952 version of "Rachel" has the great benefit of a young Richard Burton in his Hollywood debut playing Philip. With his passionate intensity and melodious voice, Burton runs away with the part (he was nominated for an Oscar) and is a tough act for Claflin to follow.
Often seen playing an unheroic hero (he was Gemma Arterton's cranky collaborator in "Their Finest"), Claflin gives Philip a different kind of a reading than Burton, but one that is well-suited to the points this "Rachel" is making.
For, not to put too fine a point on it, Claflin's Philip is kind of a dolt, an emotionally dense bear of little brain who doesn't understand a lot of things, women being first among them. The fact that we are seeing Rachel largely through his eyes makes him an unreliable narrator of a very particular sort.
In truth, though, Rachel would be a lot for anyone to get used to. A bewitching, classically feminine beauty who likes to drink herbal infusions or tisanes, she represents a style of life Philip has never even imagined existed. Not only does he give up all thoughts of vengeance, he is soon besotted with her himself.
But because Rachel proves unpredictable, because she herself is so different and, in Weisz's subtle, effortlessly complex performance, so unknowable, suspicions about her actions never die.
Gradually, almost imperceptibly, the bigger question, one that feels very contemporary, becomes whether what Rachel says and does are signs of sinister behavior or simply the actions of a woman who wants to be her own person, someone who heartbreakingly asks, "Why shouldn't I have a life of my own?"
How "My Cousin Rachel" resolves this diabolically ambivalent situation, how it deals with the "Did she? Didn't she? Who's to blame?" questions it began with, is a dilemma fated to haunt us even after the final credits roll.

Warriors Stun Cavaliers for Game 3 Win Behind Kevin Durant, Stephen Curry

CLEVELAND, OH - JUNE 7:  Kevin Durant #35 and Draymond Green #23 of the Golden State Warriors high-five in Game Three of the 2017 NBA Finals on June 7, 2017 at Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2017 NBAE (Photo by Andrew D. Bernstein/NBAE via Getty Images)
Andrew D. Bernstein/Getty Images



The Golden State Warriors are one win away from avenging last year's NBA Finals collapse.
Golden State went into Quicken Loans Arena on Wednesday and emerged with a thrilling 118-113 victory over the Cleveland Cavaliers to seize a commanding 3-0 lead in the series. It was the first Game 3 the Warriors won in their third straight Finals matchup against Cleveland.
Kevin Durant (31 points and eight rebounds) led the way and drilled a monumental go-ahead three in the final minute, while Stephen Curry (26 points and 13 rebounds) and Klay Thompson (30 points) helped carry the explosive offense as well. Brilliant efforts from LeBron James (39 points, 11 rebounds and nine assists) and Kyrie Irving (38 points) weren't enough for the Cavaliers.
         
Warriors Offense Overwhelms Cavaliers Defense
The Warriors featured the No. 1 offensive rating in the league this season, per NBA.com, while the Cavaliers countered with the No. 22 defensive rating. Cleveland was never going to shut Golden State down, and that was never more apparent than when the visitors poured in the final 11 points.
Durant went on a personal 7-0 run, including the biggest shot of the Finals to this point with his team trailing by two:
While Durant finished the game, Thompson carried the initial torch with 16 points and four threes in the first quarter. He continued the turnaround he demonstrated in Game 2 (8-of-12) after shooting 3-of-16 in Game 1, finishing 11-of-18 from the field while providing timely defense on the other end.
The Warriors as a whole connected on nine triples in the opening 12 minutes, which set the tone and an NBA record for threes in a Finals quarter. Kevin Pelton of ESPN.com put the showing into historical perspective:
Even when the Cavaliers shifted additional attention toward Thompson after his blazing start, the Warriors had three other All-Stars to carry the load. There is only so much even the best defensive teams in the league can do, and the Cavaliers were far from one of them all season.
Curry and Durant each took turns drilling perimeter shots and slicing through the lane, while Draymond Green (eight points, eight rebounds and seven assists) challenged for a triple-double with passing that caught the eye of Alex Hampl of Sports Illustrated:
Golden State's sloppy play with 18 turnovers (after committing 20 in Game 2) allowed the Cavaliers to control portions of the contest, but the abundance of offensive weapons proved too much for the home team in the closing stretch.
         
Not Even Brilliance from LeBron and Kyrie Enough for Cleveland
Durant spearheaded two straight blowout wins for the Warriors in Oracle Arena, sparking a narrative he was taking the flame from James as the league's premier player.
James, who was averaging a triple-double in the Finals coming into Wednesday's contest, responded as only he can with a performance worthy of his legend status as he nearly willed his team to victory alongside his partner in crime Irving.
James announced his presence with a rim-rattling dunk in the first quarter, consistently found teammates with his impressive passing—even though only Irving and JR Smith (16 points and five three-pointers) provided consistent help—and helped match the pace of the uptempo Warriors.  
He also moved into fourth place in Finals history in the scoring department:
While James' 27 points in the first half kept the Cavaliers within striking distance, Irving went into takeover mode with 16 points in the third quarter. The Duke product gave Cleveland a five-point lead heading to the fourth and was having success driving against the normally lethal Warriors small-ball look, as ESPN's Ryen Russillo noted:
James and Irving had the Cavaliers up six in the final three minutes before Durant's clutch finish, but there wasn't enough help to go around. Kevin Love went 1-of-9 from the field, Tristan Thompson didn't score and grabbed three boards, and Richard Jefferson, Deron Williams and Iman Shumpert combined for three points.
James and Irving will need more help if Cleveland is to avoid a sweep during Friday's Game 4.

How Kevin Durant, Warriors have adjusted without Steph Curry

OAKLAND, Calif. -- The Golden State Warriors were embarrassed in Indiana late in the season, suffering a 20-point defeat that resulted in co...